Thinking and Reading like a Scientist : Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy

Bibliographische Detailangaben

Titel
Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy
verantwortlich
Alexander J. Carroll
Erscheinungsjahr
2020
Medientyp
Preprint
Datenquelle
LISSA
sid-179-col-lissa
Tags
Tag hinzufügen

Zugang

Diese Ressource ist frei verfügbar.

author_facet Alexander J. Carroll
Alexander J. Carroll
author Alexander J. Carroll
spellingShingle Alexander J. Carroll
Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy
Social and Behavioral Sciences
LIS Scholarship Archive
critical thinking
primary literature
bepress
science process skills
Scholarly Communication
information literacy
Information Literacy
science education
Library and Information Science
author_sort alexander j. carroll
spelling Alexander J. Carroll Social and Behavioral Sciences LIS Scholarship Archive critical thinking primary literature bepress science process skills Scholarly Communication information literacy Information Literacy science education Library and Information Science http://osf.io/wsf9z/ http://dx.doi.org/10.31229/OSF.IO/WSF9Z Students entering graduate degree programs in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields or professional degree programs in the health sciences are expected to have adequate academic preparation in science process skills like the ability to read primary literature effectively. This column scrutinizes this assumption by examining how science is taught to undergraduates, finding that undergraduate STEM curricula rarely prepare students with the mastery of science process skills needed to succeed in graduate school. The column discusses some possible causes of this skill gap and suggests that academic and medical librarians are well-equipped to help students develop primary literature literacy skills. The column closes with a list of practical active reading strategies that librarians can share and model for students. The Version of Record of this manuscript has been published and is available in Medical Reference Services Quarterly, August 10, 2020, DOI: 10.1080/02763869.2020.1778336. Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy
doi_str_mv 10.31229/OSF.IO/WSF9Z
facet_avail Online
format Preprint
fullrecord blob:ai-179-E01D0-E69-CFE
id ai-179-E01D0-E69-CFE
institution FID-BBI-DE-23
imprint 2020
imprint_str_mv 2020
language English
mega_collection LISSA
match_str carroll2020thinkingandreadinglikeascientistlibrariansasfacilitatorsofprimaryliteratureliteracy
publishDateSort 2020
record_id E01D0-E69-CFE
recordtype ai
record_format ai
source_id 179
title Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy
title_unstemmed Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy
title_full Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy
title_fullStr Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy
title_full_unstemmed Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy
title_short Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy
title_sort thinking and reading like a scientist: librarians as facilitators of primary literature literacy
topic Social and Behavioral Sciences
LIS Scholarship Archive
critical thinking
primary literature
bepress
science process skills
Scholarly Communication
information literacy
Information Literacy
science education
Library and Information Science
url http://osf.io/wsf9z/
http://dx.doi.org/10.31229/OSF.IO/WSF9Z
publishDate 2020
physical
description Students entering graduate degree programs in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields or professional degree programs in the health sciences are expected to have adequate academic preparation in science process skills like the ability to read primary literature effectively. This column scrutinizes this assumption by examining how science is taught to undergraduates, finding that undergraduate STEM curricula rarely prepare students with the mastery of science process skills needed to succeed in graduate school. The column discusses some possible causes of this skill gap and suggests that academic and medical librarians are well-equipped to help students develop primary literature literacy skills. The column closes with a list of practical active reading strategies that librarians can share and model for students. The Version of Record of this manuscript has been published and is available in Medical Reference Services Quarterly, August 10, 2020, DOI: 10.1080/02763869.2020.1778336.
collection sid-179-col-lissa
format_de105
format_de14
format_de15 Preprint
format_de520
format_de540
format_dech1
format_ded117
format_degla1
format_del152
format_del189
format_dezi4
format_dezwi2
format_finc Preprint
format_nrw
_version_ 1792365998103330818
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T22:50:01.279Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fkatalog.fid-bbi.de%3Agenerator&rft.title=Thinking+and+Reading+like+a+Scientist%3A+Librarians+as+Facilitators+of+Primary+Literature+Literacy&rft.date=2020-08-10&genre=article&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.31229%2FOSF.IO%2FWSF9Z&atitle=Thinking+and+Reading+like+a+Scientist%3A+Librarians+as+Facilitators+of+Primary+Literature+Literacy&au=Alexander+J.+Carroll&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792365998103330818
author Alexander J. Carroll
author_facet Alexander J. Carroll, Alexander J. Carroll
author_sort alexander j. carroll
collection sid-179-col-lissa
description Students entering graduate degree programs in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields or professional degree programs in the health sciences are expected to have adequate academic preparation in science process skills like the ability to read primary literature effectively. This column scrutinizes this assumption by examining how science is taught to undergraduates, finding that undergraduate STEM curricula rarely prepare students with the mastery of science process skills needed to succeed in graduate school. The column discusses some possible causes of this skill gap and suggests that academic and medical librarians are well-equipped to help students develop primary literature literacy skills. The column closes with a list of practical active reading strategies that librarians can share and model for students. The Version of Record of this manuscript has been published and is available in Medical Reference Services Quarterly, August 10, 2020, DOI: 10.1080/02763869.2020.1778336.
doi_str_mv 10.31229/OSF.IO/WSF9Z
facet_avail Online
format Preprint
format_de105
format_de14
format_de15 Preprint
format_de520
format_de540
format_dech1
format_ded117
format_degla1
format_del152
format_del189
format_dezi4
format_dezwi2
format_finc Preprint
format_nrw
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-179-E01D0-E69-CFE
imprint 2020
imprint_str_mv 2020
institution FID-BBI-DE-23
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T22:50:01.279Z
match_str carroll2020thinkingandreadinglikeascientistlibrariansasfacilitatorsofprimaryliteratureliteracy
mega_collection LISSA
physical
publishDate 2020
publishDateSort 2020
record_format ai
record_id E01D0-E69-CFE
recordtype ai
source_id 179
spelling Alexander J. Carroll Social and Behavioral Sciences LIS Scholarship Archive critical thinking primary literature bepress science process skills Scholarly Communication information literacy Information Literacy science education Library and Information Science http://osf.io/wsf9z/ http://dx.doi.org/10.31229/OSF.IO/WSF9Z Students entering graduate degree programs in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields or professional degree programs in the health sciences are expected to have adequate academic preparation in science process skills like the ability to read primary literature effectively. This column scrutinizes this assumption by examining how science is taught to undergraduates, finding that undergraduate STEM curricula rarely prepare students with the mastery of science process skills needed to succeed in graduate school. The column discusses some possible causes of this skill gap and suggests that academic and medical librarians are well-equipped to help students develop primary literature literacy skills. The column closes with a list of practical active reading strategies that librarians can share and model for students. The Version of Record of this manuscript has been published and is available in Medical Reference Services Quarterly, August 10, 2020, DOI: 10.1080/02763869.2020.1778336. Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy
spellingShingle Alexander J. Carroll, Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy, Social and Behavioral Sciences, LIS Scholarship Archive, critical thinking, primary literature, bepress, science process skills, Scholarly Communication, information literacy, Information Literacy, science education, Library and Information Science
title Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy
title_full Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy
title_fullStr Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy
title_full_unstemmed Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy
title_short Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy
title_sort thinking and reading like a scientist: librarians as facilitators of primary literature literacy
title_unstemmed Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy
topic Social and Behavioral Sciences, LIS Scholarship Archive, critical thinking, primary literature, bepress, science process skills, Scholarly Communication, information literacy, Information Literacy, science education, Library and Information Science
url http://osf.io/wsf9z/, http://dx.doi.org/10.31229/OSF.IO/WSF9Z