“It’s about politics, stupid!” : Common understandings of interpersonal political communication

Bibliographische Detailangaben

Titel
“It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication
verantwortlich
Podschuweit, Nicole; Jakobs, Ilka
In
Communications, 42, 2017, 4
veröffentlicht
Erscheinungsjahr
2017
Medientyp
E-Article
Datenquelle
Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef)
Tags
Tag hinzufügen

Zugang

Zusatzinformationen online
author_facet Podschuweit, Nicole
Jakobs, Ilka
Podschuweit, Nicole
Jakobs, Ilka
author Podschuweit, Nicole
Jakobs, Ilka
spellingShingle Podschuweit, Nicole
Jakobs, Ilka
Communications
“It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Communication
author_sort podschuweit, nicole
spelling Podschuweit, Nicole Jakobs, Ilka 1613-4087 0341-2059 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Communication http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0021 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>For the general public and for scientists, interpersonal political communication is highly important; however, surveys based on self-reports often lack satisfactory validity and reliability, because political talk is embedded in everyday conversations and thus hard to remember. Furthermore, different people are likely to ascribe different meanings to the term ‘politics’. The present paper aims to further our understanding of what people perceive or do not perceive as political. To determine the factors influencing the general public’s understanding of politics, we conducted a representative telephone survey among 804 citizens of a German city. The findings indicate that people’s classification of conversations as political is determined by the characteristics of the discussed issues. Furthermore, some respondents did not mention all conversations that might influence their political opinions and behavior. Nonetheless, the matter might be relevant for research when people are asked about their political conversation behavior.</jats:p> “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication Communications
doi_str_mv 10.1515/commun-2017-0021
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Kunst und Kunstgeschichte
Philosophie
Technik
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9jb21tdW4tMjAxNy0wMDIx
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9jb21tdW4tMjAxNy0wMDIx
institution DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Rs1
FID-MEDIEN-DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-105
DE-14
FID-BBI-DE-23
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
imprint Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2017
imprint_str_mv Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2017
issn 1613-4087
0341-2059
issn_str_mv 1613-4087
0341-2059
language Undetermined
mega_collection Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef)
match_str podschuweit2017itsaboutpoliticsstupidcommonunderstandingsofinterpersonalpoliticalcommunication
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Communications
source_id 49
title “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication
title_unstemmed “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication
title_full “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication
title_fullStr “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication
title_full_unstemmed “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication
title_short “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication
title_sort “it’s about politics, stupid!”: common understandings of interpersonal political communication
topic Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Communication
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0021
publishDate 2017
physical
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>For the general public and for scientists, interpersonal political communication is highly important; however, surveys based on self-reports often lack satisfactory validity and reliability, because political talk is embedded in everyday conversations and thus hard to remember. Furthermore, different people are likely to ascribe different meanings to the term ‘politics’. The present paper aims to further our understanding of what people perceive or do not perceive as political. To determine the factors influencing the general public’s understanding of politics, we conducted a representative telephone survey among 804 citizens of a German city. The findings indicate that people’s classification of conversations as political is determined by the characteristics of the discussed issues. Furthermore, some respondents did not mention all conversations that might influence their political opinions and behavior. Nonetheless, the matter might be relevant for research when people are asked about their political conversation behavior.</jats:p>
container_issue 4
container_start_page 0
container_title Communications
container_volume 42
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792343781529354243
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:57:09.943Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fkatalog.fid-bbi.de%3Agenerator&rft.title=%E2%80%9CIt%E2%80%99s+about+politics%2C+stupid%21%E2%80%9D%3A+Common+understandings+of+interpersonal+political+communication&rft.date=2017-01-27&genre=article&issn=0341-2059&volume=42&issue=4&jtitle=Communications&atitle=%E2%80%9CIt%E2%80%99s+about+politics%2C+stupid%21%E2%80%9D%3A+Common+understandings+of+interpersonal+political+communication&aulast=Jakobs&aufirst=Ilka&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1515%2Fcommun-2017-0021&rft.language%5B0%5D=und
SOLR
_version_ 1792343781529354243
author Podschuweit, Nicole, Jakobs, Ilka
author_facet Podschuweit, Nicole, Jakobs, Ilka, Podschuweit, Nicole, Jakobs, Ilka
author_sort podschuweit, nicole
container_issue 4
container_start_page 0
container_title Communications
container_volume 42
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>For the general public and for scientists, interpersonal political communication is highly important; however, surveys based on self-reports often lack satisfactory validity and reliability, because political talk is embedded in everyday conversations and thus hard to remember. Furthermore, different people are likely to ascribe different meanings to the term ‘politics’. The present paper aims to further our understanding of what people perceive or do not perceive as political. To determine the factors influencing the general public’s understanding of politics, we conducted a representative telephone survey among 804 citizens of a German city. The findings indicate that people’s classification of conversations as political is determined by the characteristics of the discussed issues. Furthermore, some respondents did not mention all conversations that might influence their political opinions and behavior. Nonetheless, the matter might be relevant for research when people are asked about their political conversation behavior.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1515/commun-2017-0021
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Kunst und Kunstgeschichte, Philosophie, Technik
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9jb21tdW4tMjAxNy0wMDIx
imprint Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2017
imprint_str_mv Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2017
institution DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, FID-MEDIEN-DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, FID-BBI-DE-23, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161
issn 1613-4087, 0341-2059
issn_str_mv 1613-4087, 0341-2059
language Undetermined
last_indexed 2024-03-01T16:57:09.943Z
match_str podschuweit2017itsaboutpoliticsstupidcommonunderstandingsofinterpersonalpoliticalcommunication
mega_collection Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef)
physical
publishDate 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Communications
source_id 49
spelling Podschuweit, Nicole Jakobs, Ilka 1613-4087 0341-2059 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Communication http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0021 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>For the general public and for scientists, interpersonal political communication is highly important; however, surveys based on self-reports often lack satisfactory validity and reliability, because political talk is embedded in everyday conversations and thus hard to remember. Furthermore, different people are likely to ascribe different meanings to the term ‘politics’. The present paper aims to further our understanding of what people perceive or do not perceive as political. To determine the factors influencing the general public’s understanding of politics, we conducted a representative telephone survey among 804 citizens of a German city. The findings indicate that people’s classification of conversations as political is determined by the characteristics of the discussed issues. Furthermore, some respondents did not mention all conversations that might influence their political opinions and behavior. Nonetheless, the matter might be relevant for research when people are asked about their political conversation behavior.</jats:p> “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication Communications
spellingShingle Podschuweit, Nicole, Jakobs, Ilka, Communications, “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Communication
title “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication
title_full “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication
title_fullStr “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication
title_full_unstemmed “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication
title_short “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication
title_sort “it’s about politics, stupid!”: common understandings of interpersonal political communication
title_unstemmed “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication
topic Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Communication
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0021