“It’s about politics, stupid!” : Common understandings of interpersonal political communication
Bibliographische Detailangaben
- Titel
- “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication
- verantwortlich
- ;
- In
- Communications, 42, 2017, 4
- veröffentlicht
- Erscheinungsjahr
- 2017
- Medientyp
- E-Article
- Datenquelle
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef)
- Tags
- Tag hinzufügen
Zugang
Weblinks
- Details Klicken Sie hier, um den Inhalt der Registerkarte zu laden.
- Internformat Klicken Sie hier, um den Inhalt der Registerkarte zu laden.
author_facet |
Podschuweit, Nicole Jakobs, Ilka Podschuweit, Nicole Jakobs, Ilka |
---|---|
author |
Podschuweit, Nicole Jakobs, Ilka |
spellingShingle |
Podschuweit, Nicole Jakobs, Ilka Communications “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Communication |
author_sort |
podschuweit, nicole |
spelling |
Podschuweit, Nicole Jakobs, Ilka 1613-4087 0341-2059 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Communication http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0021 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>For the general public and for scientists, interpersonal political communication is highly important; however, surveys based on self-reports often lack satisfactory validity and reliability, because political talk is embedded in everyday conversations and thus hard to remember. Furthermore, different people are likely to ascribe different meanings to the term ‘politics’. The present paper aims to further our understanding of what people perceive or do not perceive as political. To determine the factors influencing the general public’s understanding of politics, we conducted a representative telephone survey among 804 citizens of a German city. The findings indicate that people’s classification of conversations as political is determined by the characteristics of the discussed issues. Furthermore, some respondents did not mention all conversations that might influence their political opinions and behavior. Nonetheless, the matter might be relevant for research when people are asked about their political conversation behavior.</jats:p> “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication Communications |
doi_str_mv |
10.1515/commun-2017-0021 |
facet_avail |
Online |
finc_class_facet |
Kunst und Kunstgeschichte Philosophie Technik |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9jb21tdW4tMjAxNy0wMDIx |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9jb21tdW4tMjAxNy0wMDIx |
institution |
DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Rs1 FID-MEDIEN-DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-105 DE-14 FID-BBI-DE-23 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 |
imprint |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2017 |
imprint_str_mv |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2017 |
issn |
1613-4087 0341-2059 |
issn_str_mv |
1613-4087 0341-2059 |
language |
Undetermined |
mega_collection |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef) |
match_str |
podschuweit2017itsaboutpoliticsstupidcommonunderstandingsofinterpersonalpoliticalcommunication |
publishDateSort |
2017 |
publisher |
Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Communications |
source_id |
49 |
title |
“It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication |
title_unstemmed |
“It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication |
title_full |
“It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication |
title_fullStr |
“It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication |
title_full_unstemmed |
“It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication |
title_short |
“It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication |
title_sort |
“it’s about politics, stupid!”: common understandings of interpersonal political communication |
topic |
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Communication |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0021 |
publishDate |
2017 |
physical |
|
description |
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>For the general public and for scientists, interpersonal political communication is highly important; however, surveys based on self-reports often lack satisfactory validity and reliability, because political talk is embedded in everyday conversations and thus hard to remember. Furthermore, different people are likely to ascribe different meanings to the term ‘politics’. The present paper aims to further our understanding of what people perceive or do not perceive as political. To determine the factors influencing the general public’s understanding of politics, we conducted a representative telephone survey among 804 citizens of a German city. The findings indicate that people’s classification of conversations as political is determined by the characteristics of the discussed issues. Furthermore, some respondents did not mention all conversations that might influence their political opinions and behavior. Nonetheless, the matter might be relevant for research when people are asked about their political conversation behavior.</jats:p> |
container_issue |
4 |
container_start_page |
0 |
container_title |
Communications |
container_volume |
42 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792343781529354243 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T16:57:09.943Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fkatalog.fid-bbi.de%3Agenerator&rft.title=%E2%80%9CIt%E2%80%99s+about+politics%2C+stupid%21%E2%80%9D%3A+Common+understandings+of+interpersonal+political+communication&rft.date=2017-01-27&genre=article&issn=0341-2059&volume=42&issue=4&jtitle=Communications&atitle=%E2%80%9CIt%E2%80%99s+about+politics%2C+stupid%21%E2%80%9D%3A+Common+understandings+of+interpersonal+political+communication&aulast=Jakobs&aufirst=Ilka&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1515%2Fcommun-2017-0021&rft.language%5B0%5D=und |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792343781529354243 |
author | Podschuweit, Nicole, Jakobs, Ilka |
author_facet | Podschuweit, Nicole, Jakobs, Ilka, Podschuweit, Nicole, Jakobs, Ilka |
author_sort | podschuweit, nicole |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 0 |
container_title | Communications |
container_volume | 42 |
description | <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>For the general public and for scientists, interpersonal political communication is highly important; however, surveys based on self-reports often lack satisfactory validity and reliability, because political talk is embedded in everyday conversations and thus hard to remember. Furthermore, different people are likely to ascribe different meanings to the term ‘politics’. The present paper aims to further our understanding of what people perceive or do not perceive as political. To determine the factors influencing the general public’s understanding of politics, we conducted a representative telephone survey among 804 citizens of a German city. The findings indicate that people’s classification of conversations as political is determined by the characteristics of the discussed issues. Furthermore, some respondents did not mention all conversations that might influence their political opinions and behavior. Nonetheless, the matter might be relevant for research when people are asked about their political conversation behavior.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/commun-2017-0021 |
facet_avail | Online |
finc_class_facet | Kunst und Kunstgeschichte, Philosophie, Technik |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTUxNS9jb21tdW4tMjAxNy0wMDIx |
imprint | Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2017 |
imprint_str_mv | Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2017 |
institution | DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Rs1, FID-MEDIEN-DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-105, DE-14, FID-BBI-DE-23, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161 |
issn | 1613-4087, 0341-2059 |
issn_str_mv | 1613-4087, 0341-2059 |
language | Undetermined |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T16:57:09.943Z |
match_str | podschuweit2017itsaboutpoliticsstupidcommonunderstandingsofinterpersonalpoliticalcommunication |
mega_collection | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (CrossRef) |
physical | |
publishDate | 2017 |
publishDateSort | 2017 |
publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Communications |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Podschuweit, Nicole Jakobs, Ilka 1613-4087 0341-2059 Walter de Gruyter GmbH Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Communication http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0021 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>For the general public and for scientists, interpersonal political communication is highly important; however, surveys based on self-reports often lack satisfactory validity and reliability, because political talk is embedded in everyday conversations and thus hard to remember. Furthermore, different people are likely to ascribe different meanings to the term ‘politics’. The present paper aims to further our understanding of what people perceive or do not perceive as political. To determine the factors influencing the general public’s understanding of politics, we conducted a representative telephone survey among 804 citizens of a German city. The findings indicate that people’s classification of conversations as political is determined by the characteristics of the discussed issues. Furthermore, some respondents did not mention all conversations that might influence their political opinions and behavior. Nonetheless, the matter might be relevant for research when people are asked about their political conversation behavior.</jats:p> “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication Communications |
spellingShingle | Podschuweit, Nicole, Jakobs, Ilka, Communications, “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Communication |
title | “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication |
title_full | “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication |
title_fullStr | “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication |
title_full_unstemmed | “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication |
title_short | “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication |
title_sort | “it’s about politics, stupid!”: common understandings of interpersonal political communication |
title_unstemmed | “It’s about politics, stupid!”: Common understandings of interpersonal political communication |
topic | Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Communication |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0021 |